https://www.asiatimes.com/2019/03/opinion/chinas-space-program-soars/?fbclid=IwAR3-2DFBEd_1BnMt4qtQGxATXSID2eWVk-F8nGD6ZyqdcJ5rnf92BecEq08
Sent from my iPad
Tuesday, March 26, 2019
Friday, March 22, 2019
Thursday, March 21, 2019
Monday, March 18, 2019
Fwd: A Mission for the Space Force
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Info@Launchspace.com" <info@launchspace.com>
Date: March 18, 2019 at 8:06:25 AM CDT
To: Bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com
Subject: A Mission for the Space Force
Reply-To: info@launchspace.com
A Mission for the Space Force
(Launchspace Staff Writers)Bethesda, MD - Many of the people familiar with the development of a Space Force have assumed that the current organization known as Air Force Space Command (AFSPC), headquartered at Peterson AFB in Colorado, will be transformed into this new service while remaining under the Secretary of the Air Force. This would be analogous to the Marine Corps being under the Secretary of the Navy. However, the mission of the new Space Force may well be quickly morphed into something quite different than the mission of the AFSPC.The growing congestion in low orbits and adversarial challenges in low and high orbits may well inevitably lead to a major paradigm shift in space-based national security operations. Such operations would logically be assigned to the U.S. Space Force. Currently, space-based national security operations are limited by old technologies and a lack needed systems to keep up with evolving threats. Simply put, the U.S. has a "peacetime" set of defenses for its valuable security assets in orbits about the Earth. If real war should break out among the major powers, many of these assets could not be properly defended, even though much of America's military operations depend on these assets. The results would certainly be expensive in terms of resources and people.Thus, one of the most important missions for the Space Force may be the direct and comprehensive protection of space-based security assets. This should involve a very aggressive set of operations that keep defense-supporting spacecraft separated from other objects in orbit and that offer protection from aggressive attacks. This is not an easy mission because of the several variables and growing population of controlled adversarial devices and uncontrolled debris objects.The implications of such a mission may include the rapid advancement and deployment of new technologies and systems that can:
- Create and defend a "military" zone in space that is reserved for security assets
- Detect and track all potential threatening objects with much higher accuracy and responsiveness than is now available
- Actively remove a portion of the threatening debris population on a permanent basis
- Shield assets from direct kinetic attacks and RF jamming
- Maintain an offensive space-based capability
These suggestions may seem rather extreme, but the alternative may be much more extreme.___________________
Wednesday, March 13, 2019
Monday, March 11, 2019
Saturday, March 9, 2019
A blog covering design that weren’t successful
FalseSteps.wordpress.com A blog that covers spacecraft designs that didn't work out.
Space historian Drye considered that possibility and published a detailed analysis of Chrysler's spaceship in his blog "False Steps: The Space Race as it might have been
."
Sent from my iPad
Friday, March 8, 2019
The Daily Beast: ICE is detaining 50,000 people, an all-time high
ICE is detaining 50,000 people, an all-time high
The Daily Beast
Never before has America held so many allegedly undocumented immigrants in detention at one time. Read the full story
Shared from Apple News
Sent from my iPad
Wednesday, March 6, 2019
Shuttle
Space shuttles have taken 355 people to space. Since their demise in 2011, the United States has been unable to put people into space except on other nations' spacecraft. It's a capability the U.S. has had since Alan Shepard's flight on May 5, 1961. The U.S. went from flying and operating the most advanced and capable spacecraft in the world, to flying as passengers under foreign command. Americans continue to journey to space on Soyuz spacecraft, but we are no longer able to work on facilities such as Hubble, or assemble large structures in space. We will look back on the space shuttle one day and realize what the nation lost, or rather, what it gave up. GWS Abbey -- Lost in Space, Washington Examiner.
Program s/b restarted Bm
Sent from my iPad
Tuesday, March 5, 2019
Monday, March 4, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)