A Super Big Problem!!!
As in the Furgerson situation, all over the USA, a large group that would not work if offered a job, plus no respect for law & order, no respect for others----this is a BIG problem--- going to have to be dealt with some day !
From: "Peter M. Callahan" <pmcallah@gmail.com>
Date: January 29, 2017 at 8:16:36 PM CST
To: Bobby Martin <bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com>
Subject: Muslim Mafia
If Trump fails, America will be no more. There is no one to take Trump's place. SUPPORT TRUMP 100 percent❗ 💯 🇺🇸
This book told me all I needed to hear back in 2009❗
Muslim Mafia
https://www.amazon.com/Muslim-Mafia-Underworld-Conspiring-Islamize/dp/1935071106
--Sent from Gmail Mobile
Mars Priority – Expresses a sense of Congress that NASA should prioritize funding to keep deep space exploration on track to get humans to Mars, utilizing the Moon and cislunar space and leveraging commercial capabilities and assets.
Specifics – Requires the first 20-year plan NASA submits to include a five year range in which NASA intends for astronauts to land on Mars. Instructs NASA in its first 10-year plan to address the concerns laid out by the National Research Council "Pathways to Exploration" report.
Expresses a sense of Congress that the United States should maintain a continuous human presence in low Earth orbit and, to the extent practical and consistent with national security priorities, should utilize commercial capabilities for operations in low Earth orbit.
Make NASA Great Again: A Memo to the New Administration, Futurism
"So [George] Abbey thinks the architecture of NASA's future plans should be thoroughly examined and redrawn. It won't even require a budgetary increase - just a smarter allocation of the currently available funding. For instance, he suggests scrapping the SLS program altogether. There's too much redundancy in the heavy-lift rocket market - SpaceX is working on their Falcon Heavy, Blue Origin is busy developing the New Glenn booster, and United Launch Alliance is drawing up plans for a Vulcan rocket. He also thinks a simple scaling-up of Boeing's already-proven and successful X-37 would create a serviceable replacement for the decommissioned shuttle fleet - a spaceplane that could be fitted for crewed flights and that also has the ability to transport matériel into space for orbital, in situ assembly."
Trump's victory has placed NASA at a crossroads.
Once he assumes the presidency officially, Trump is expected to appoint Republicans to key positions who also advocate a return to the moon.
House Rep. James Bridenstine, a Republican from Oklahoma, has been mentioned as a possible candidate who would head NASA in a Trump administration.
According to The Washington Post, Bridenstine has been a proponent of putting Americans back on the moon.
From: Kent Castle <kent.d.castle@hotmail.com>
Date: January 24, 2017 at 3:56:59 PM CST
To: Patterson James <w8ljz@aol.com>, Choban Peter <peter.s.choban@aero.org>, Gil Carman <gil77546@sbcglobal.net>, Reason Marilou <loganlou55@yahoo.com>, Tetzloff Connie <owari567@comcast.net>, Martin Bobby <bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com>, Madsen Ron <ronstar@pdq.net>, Haden Lee <dldhhaden@gmail.com>, Smith Harold <ke5gsk@gmail.com>, Hultberg Jane <jhultberg@coa.edu>, Brown Paul <paul.brown1@yahoo.com>, Grant Berl <berlgrant@frontier.com>, Bentz Jerry <bentz@sbcglobal.net>, Julian Robert <RWJ1003@comcast.net>, Arnold Jenny <arnoldrj@bellsouth.net>, Shaffer Anita <amshaf@yahoo.com>, Astrology Valkyrie <astrogoddess@valkyrieastrology.com>, Ware Fred <fred_ware@comcast.net>, Rice Gary <whs46992@gmail.com>, "Williams Tom" <gtomwill@att.net>, Leach Larry <ljleach@tds.net>, Baird Darren <darren.t.baird@nasa.gov>, Bilger Boyd <boyd.bilger@suddenlink.net>, "Castle Kerrick" <kjcastle@hotmail.com>
Subject: Fw: His Legacy / Fed web sites
From:
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 12:26 AM
To
Subject: His Legacy / Fed web sites
Subject: His Legacy / Fed web sites
These charts came from the Federal Reserve Bank in St. Louis.
Less government, less taxes, more freedom.
=
Here is the real story of America 's decline right from their own Fed web sites. Obama's Recovery In Just 9 Charts
From: Kent Castle <kent.d.castle@hotmail.com>
Date: January 23, 2017 at 5:15:25 PM CST
To: Choban Peter <peter.s.choban@aero.org>, Bogan Carole <bcbogan@earthlink.net>, Brown Paul <paul.brown1@yahoo.com>, Bentz Jerry <bentz@sbcglobal.net>, Martin Bobby <bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com>, "Astrology Valkyrie" <astrogoddess@valkyrieastrology.com>, Arnold Jenny <arnoldrj@bellsouth.net>, Haden Lee <dldhhaden@gmail.com>, Patterson James <w8ljz@aol.com>, Bilger Boyd <boyd.bilger@suddenlink.net>, Tetzloff Connie <owari567@comcast.net>, Williams Tom <gtomwill@att.net>, Cole Tony <rita.coll@sbcglobal.net>, Grant Berl <berlgrant@frontier.com>, Smith Harold <ke5gsk@gmail.com>, Gil Carman <gil77546@sbcglobal.net>, Julian Robert <RWJ1003@comcast.net>, Reason Marilou <loganlou55@yahoo.com>, Madsen Ron <ronstar@pdq.net>
Subject: New Satellites, WX
The first images from the new weather satellite just arrived, and they're absolutely incredible
The inside track on Washington politics.
Be the first to know about new stories from PowerPost. Sign up to follow, and we'll e-mail you free updates as they're published.You'll receive free e-mail news updates each time a new story is published.You're all set!
GOES-16 captured this view of the moon, as it looks across the Pacific Northwest on Jan. 15. As with earlier GOES spacecraft, GOES-16 will use the moon for calibration. (NOAA/NASA)The satellite formerly known as GOES-R (so Prince, right?) has transmitted its first images back to Earth, and they are flooring. From the details on the face of the moon to the incredible resolution of cumulus over the Caribbean, these first pixels portend a sunny future for NOAA's new GOES-16 satellite.
Meteorologists are drooling. This release coincides with the first day of the American Meteorological Society's annual meeting. There are thousands of weather geeks in Seattle this week, and — at least on Monday — they're all looking at this next-gen satellite imagery.
As we've written before, GOES-R satellite has six instruments, two of which are weather-related. The Advanced Baseline Imager, developed by Harris Corp., is the "camera" that looks down on Earth. The pictures it sends back will be clearer and more detailed than what's created by the current satellites.
[This new weather satellite isn't just good for the U.S. — it's good for the world]
The ABI can scan half the Earth — or the "full disk" — in five minutes. If forecasters want to home in on an area of severe weather, it can scan that region every 30 seconds. Weather radars can't even scan faster than six minutes.
NOAA's new GOES-16 satellite contains a global lightning mapper, which will continuously track and transmit all lightning strikes across North America. NOAA's new GOES-16 satellite contains a global lightning mapper, which will continuously track and transmit all lightning strikes across North America. (NOAA)The other weather instrument, the Global Lightning Mapper, will continuously track and transmit all lightning strikes across North America and its surrounding oceans. Developed by Lockheed, it can detect the changes in light on Earth and thus the rate and intensity of lightning in thunderstorms and hurricanes.
GOES-16 is expected to go operational in November, approximately one year after its launch.
277Comments
From: Kent Castle <kent.d.castle@hotmail.com>
Date: January 20, 2017 at 4:34:24 PM CST
To: Patterson James <w8ljz@aol.com>, Haden Lee <dldhhaden@gmail.com>, "Choban Peter" <peter.s.choban@aero.org>, Gil Carman <gil77546@sbcglobal.net>, "Bogan Carole" <bcbogan@earthlink.net>, Madsen Ron <ronstar@pdq.net>, Reason Marilou <loganlou55@yahoo.com>, Martin Bobby <bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com>, "Shaffer Anita" <amshaf@yahoo.com>, Arnold Jenny <arnoldrj@bellsouth.net>, "Astrology Valkyrie" <astrogoddess@valkyrieastrology.com>
Subject: Weather
At 11:59 am eastern, the official White House website had a lengthy information page about the threat of climate change and the steps the federal government had taken to fight it. At noon, at the instant Donald Trump took office, the page was gone, as well as any mention of climate change or global warming.It's customary for www.whitehouse.gov to flip over to the new administration exactly at noon, but the only mention of climate on President Trump's new website is under his "America First Energy Plan" page, in which he vows to destroy President Obama's Climate Action Plan, which is a government-wide plan to reduce carbon emissions and address climate change.
"President Trump is committed to eliminating harmful and unnecessary policies such as the Climate Action Plan and the Waters of the U.S. rule," the site says. A search of the website found no mention of "global warming," and the only mentions of "climate change" were archived pages that, after clicking on the links, led to scrubbed pages.Here's what President Obama's climate change page looked like this morning:
And here's what it looks like now:
#
Update: With White House "climate change" page now removed, a pledge to increase drilling has been added as part of 'An America First Energy Plan.'
WHY ? ! We have ZERO manned capability--- cots suppose to provide it in 2015. No capability since 2011 !!! THE SAD truth, cots underfunded, Congress not interested !!! Better wake up!
Control of EO critical to the USA!!
Jim Hillhouse
March 5, 2014 at 7:19 pm
Well, after talking to Capitol Hill staffers, they too are suffering the same head issues I am. At least I'm in good company.
Rather than talk about what Congress will or will not pay for, let's review what Congress has done since 2010 on space funding.
Congress has, on its own and despite both opposition from the Administration and aggressive delaying tactics on the SLS and Orion programs from NASA, appropriated those amounts needed to keep both Orion and SLS on track. And just as it's done since 2010, Congress is going to do what it wants on HSF, which is fund Orion and SLS fully.
What Congress sees is not a justification for Commercial Crew. Far from it. Congressional staffers are well aware of the true progress of that program and no, none of those players are getting us to ISS anytime soon. That's largely NASA's fault since Congress has informed it that the CCP program needed to down-selected years ago to better focus limited resources for faster progress. But NASA's leadership didn't do that for political reasons. Loose Boeing and CCP looses luster and respectability. Loose Sierra Nevada and we working on three capsule programs. And if you want to make engineers working in GN&C or ELSS laugh, tell them that one of the CCP companies will be flying crews by 2016. Guffaws galore.
And those in Congress specializing in space are well aware that, had getting independent access to ISS for our nation really been Job #1 for NASA's leadership, then the Administration would have approved Boeing's proposal for the X-37B follow-on, the 5 crew X-37C. We are talking about a dependable spacecraft that can sit in orbit for over a year and NASA said no to making it a crewed vehicle. Why?
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/…/x-37b-expanded-capabiliti…/
What Congress does see is that if we had not gone through the nonsense of 2010, we would be much closer to our own capability to launch crews to ISS than we are today. Instead, Neil Armstrong was right–the Administration changed our nation's HSF course in secret, without consultation, and mucked things up.
From: "Grassfire" <alert@grassrootsaction.com>
Date: January 7, 2017 at 7:00:55 PM CST
To: <bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com>
Subject: Obama's "long-lasting" damage to Israel
Bobby,
After what Obama and the U.N. just did to Israel, we must demand that incoming President Trump DEFUND THE U.N. and stand with Israel. Our friends at Liberty Counsel are taking the lead in this effort. Please click here to automatically sign Liberty Counel's "Defund the. U.N. and Stand With Israel" petition.
And see below for more details.
Grassfire.
Report: Obama''s "long-lasting" damage to Israel
The U.N.'s anti-Israel resolution has far-reaching ramifications that cannot be easily undone and has caused what Charles Krauthammer called "long-lasting" damage against the nation of Israel.
Then, Secretary of State John Kerry gave the most anti-Israel speech ever by a ranking U.S. official in denouncing Israel. It was unprecedented in its scope and tone, cementing the Obama legacy as the most anti-Israel of any modern president.
+ + We must DEFUND The U.N. And Stand With Israel!
These actions have brought to light the urgent need for the new Congress and the Trump Administration to DEFUND the U.N. once and for all and condemn this organization that is undermining both U.S. and Israeli interests. America should no longer be paying the freight or this anti-Semitic organization whose primary focus is to attack our ally, Israel!
That is why Grassfire is partnering with our friends at Liberty Counsel on an urgent petition to DENOUNCE and DEFUND the U.N. while we STAND WITH ISRAEL.
Bobby, will you join with Liberty Counsel to call on Congress and the Trump administration to DENOUNCE and DEFUND the U.N. while reaffirming America's commitment to STAND WITH ISRAEL? Go here to automatically sign with one click:
+ + U.N. Anti-Israel Resolution A "U.S. Operation"
Krauthammer adds that the damaging anti-Israel U.N. resolution was a "U.S. operation all the way" -- the final salvo in Obama's anti-Israel agenda that has put Israel in the crosshairs of growing world tensions.
Plus, the U.N. with Obama's help has been exposed as a BLATANTLY ANTI-SEMITIC organization that is focused on attacking Israel. In 2016, the U.N. Security Counsel adopted 24 resolutions, with 20 of the 24 (83%) targeting Israel!
Enough is enough!
It's time to DENOUNCE and DEFUND the U.N.! Go here to sign.
And thanks for taking action!
Grassfire
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
(Note: Please do not reply directly to this email. This address is not designed to receive personal messages. To contact Grassfire with comments, questions or to change your status, see the link below.)
+ + + + +
Grassfire, a division of Grassroots Action, Inc., is a million-strong network of grassroots conservatives that's dedicated to equipping you with tools to give you a real impact on the key issues of our day. Copyright 2014 Grassroots Action, Inc.
+ + Comments? Questions?
www.grassfirehq.com/email.asp?ind=10
+ + For technical questions regarding this email, please click below:
www.grassfirehq.com/techemail.asp?ind=15
+ + + + +
Click here to be removed from this list or send a written request to:
Grassroots Action
PO Box 277
Maxwell,IA 50161
You are signed up as: bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com.
Click here to change your email address.
The Space Shuttle program not only maintained our preeminence in space, it raised our technical expertise and further increased our prestige among the developed nations of the world—precisely the same reasons why the Chinese are now working toward landing a man on the Moon.
Congress is our last hope of putting a stop to the dismantling of a once great agency. They are concerned about job losses and the economic impact, but in the long run, they are not near as costly as the loss of an inspirational vision for the next generation of space scientists, engineers and explorers. You have only to look at Lewis and Clark, our westward expansion, Armstrong and Aldrin landing on the Moon to know exploration is in our blood. We should be proud of it. Americans need a frontier.
Well, after talking to Capitol Hill staffers, they too are suffering the same head issues I am. At least I'm in good company.
Rather than talk about what Congress will or will not pay for, let's review what Congress has done since 2010 on space funding.
Congress has, on its own and despite both opposition from the Administration and aggressive delaying tactics on the SLS and Orion programs from NASA, appropriated those amounts needed to keep both Orion and SLS on track. And just as it's done since 2010, Congress is going to do what it wants on HSF, which is fund Orion and SLS fully.
What Congress sees is not a justification for Commercial Crew. Far from it. Congressional staffers are well aware of the true progress of that program and no, none of those players are getting us to ISS anytime soon. That's largely NASA's fault since Congress has informed it that the CCP program needed to down-selected years ago to better focus limited resources for faster progress. But NASA's leadership didn't do that for political reasons. Loose Boeing and CCP looses luster and respectability. Loose Sierra Nevada and we working on three capsule programs. And if you want to make engineers working in GN&C or ELSS laugh, tell them that one of the CCP companies will be flying crews by 2016. Guffaws galore.
And those in Congress specializing in space are well aware that, had getting independent access to ISS for our nation really been Job #1 for NASA's leadership, then the Administration would have approved Boeing's proposal for the X-37B follow-on, the 5 crew X-37C. We are talking about a dependable spacecraft that can sit in orbit for over a year and NASA said no to making it a crewed vehicle. Why?
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/03/x-37b-expanded-capabilities-iss-missions/
What Congress does see is that if we had not gone through the nonsense of 2010, we would be much closer to our own capability to launch crews to ISS than we are today. Instead, Neil Armstrong was right–the Administration changed our nation's HSF course in secret, without consultation, and mucked things up.
When it comes to the Moon, Congress is funding $3.5B annually on the DDTE for Orion and SLS. Anything else will have to wait for a new Administration as there is zero trust right now in Congress of anything the White House or NASA HQ are selling about human spaceflight
