Monday, February 29, 2016

Space Shuttle Capability

Space Shuttle Capability

At one time, 60 percent of public supported shuttle. We flew it once & can get it going again. The USA needs this capability. The X37C per Abbey could get the capability back.

To do this, we must get the attention of Congress, so if you feel strongly, regarding this important capability, please spread the word any way you can--- blog, tweet, etc. Thanks



Sent from my iPad

Sunday, February 28, 2016

Former NASA Flight Director Says A Return To The Moon Is Necessary Before Heading To Mars

WHEN we gave up shuttle, we gave up our role as leader. We need to regain capability.


http://www.ibtimes.com/pulse/former-nasa-flight-director-says-return-moon-necessary-heading-mars-1745722


Sent from my iPad

Truly tragic for AMERICA ! Tweet your people in Congress, let's get it Going!

Shuttle is unique as a system!

"Of course, shuttle is unique as a system; no one can match the capability of the space shuttle."

"Of course, shuttle is unique as a system; no one can match the capability of the space shuttle."

Help get this in media---this is a critical point--winged vehicle vs. Capsule
Don't start a whole new type of architecture that causes you to go back and start flying capsules, which gave up many years ago."
Keep flying shuttle/shuttle concept indefinitely ---George Abbey
BAIKONUR, Kazakhstan (KTRK) -- If the shuttle Discovery launches this month, that will leave just two shuttle launches left before the American space shuttle program comes to an end.

Many space experts say Americans will be shocked next spring when they finally realize that we will have to rely on Russia to get to space for years to come. So what does that mean to the US space program, and those who work for NASA?

Eyewitness News Anchor Tom Koch just returned from Russia and Kazakhstan and got an unprecedented behind-the-scenes look at the future of America's space travel.
We were the first American news crew in 15 years to cover a Russian space launch. We traveled first to Moscow and then to Kazakhstan, where Russia launched astronaut Scott Kelly and two cosmonauts on the Soyuz rocket.
After next spring, the Soyuz will be our only way to get to space, and some space experts think America is making a big mistake.
For nearly 30 years, the shuttles have been America's primary space transportation system. But when the final shuttle is retired next June, the only way for Americans to get into space will be on board the Soyuz rocket.
After nearly three decades of watching the sleek, modern shuttle launch, Americans must get used to the idea that NASA's near-term future will rely on Russia.
It was President George W. Bush who decided six years ago to retire the shuttle fleet next year and build another mode of transportation into space. That was a move Russian space officials told us in an exclusive interview that surprised even them.
"It was a surprise for the overall community, and of course to us," said Alexey Krasnov with the Russian Space Agency. "Of course, shuttle is unique as a system; no one can match the capability of the space shuttle."
The plan was for the US to build another space vehicle, one that could eventually carry Americans to the moon and Mars. But NASA didn't have enough time or money to get it done.
Despite that fact, President Barack Obama and congress have decided not to extend the life of the shuttles until a new spaceship is built.
"I m not sure so many Americans actually know that we're not going to have a human space flight program for a while," shuttle commander Mark Kelly said.
Kelly was there to watch his twin brother, Scott, launch on the Soyuz to the International Space Station. He admits relying on Russia is not an ideal situation but one that's been in the plan for a long time.
"But the good news is we're gonna continue, we're gonna build something new, and we'll be flying again here in hopefully five or six years," Kelly said.
NASA officials point out America has been relying on Russia for years, launching many astronauts on board the Soyuz. And they say America will still lead the International Space Station.
"It's a misnomer to say that we're not a leader in space," said Bill Gerstenmaier, NASA's associate administrator. "We still are leading in space; we're doing it a different way."
"When the shuttle goes away, we're not gonna be the lead on transportation, but we're the lead across the board on many other things," Joel Montablano, NASA's Russia manager, said. "Together we make it happen; no one country can do this."
"I think the United States by giving up the shuttle is making a serious mistake because technologically, it's the most advanced space vehicle in the world, and really there is no reason not to continue to fly it," former Johnson Space Center Director George Abbey said.
In Moscow, Abbey told us NASA should keep flying the shuttle indefinitely and in the meantime build a new space vehicle based on the technology it knows -- winged shuttles. He insists the new rockets that NASA has planned are a step backwards.
"Here we've got really the greatest vehicle in the world, and we are giving it up," Abbey said. "Don't start a whole new type of architecture that causes you to go back and start flying capsules, which gave up many years ago."
Abbey says without the shuttle, NASA has no way to get large cargos into space and that will make it more difficult to operate the space station. And he predicts more big layoffs in Houston and Florida when the shuttle program ends.
"For the United States to be in this situation is poor planning, and it doesn't really exhibit very good vision for the future," Abbey said.
Many space experts say the fault lies with members of congress who are more interested in saving jobs in their districts than funding a long-range, comprehensive plan for America's space future.
Monday on Eyewitness News at 6pm, we will take you inside the Russian space program in both Moscow and Kazakhstan, a place few American reporters have been since the fall of the Soviet Union.

Sent from my iPad

TOTALLY NONSENSICAL decisions re shuttle & ( someday) COTS

Just like many nonsensical decisions by this adm, & bush re space shuttle, what sense does it make to kill shuttle & PAY Russia! They are not even serious about the INFERIOR commercial effort. Look at all the jobs lost across the Nation, the critical capabilities lost. Many of our experts advised this adm as to the proper course of action --- GET a REPLACEMENT before you retire shuttle. One can only conclude , shuttle retirement was a plan to damage the USA. If you look at other actions by this adm that have damaged this country, it makes sense!

Sent from my iPad

DESTRUCTION of Most Fantastic flying machine built by man--- YOU CAN Get it Restarted--- organize & get large numbers tweeting Congress before it is TOO LATE!!!

Look at capabilities we need---- gone
Look at jobs- tens of thousands across nation-----gone
Look at new design/ innovations ------------gone
Look at on orbit capabilities---- gone
Look at billions wasted---------gone
Look at our youths interest in space--- gone
Look at periodic on orbit astronaut operations & capabilities developed--- gone

Our leaders were told by experts to keep shuttle flying!

Outside box leader should re-start this program & improve this amazing vehicle! As summarized by a former Chief Engineer at Kennedy Space Center, "The Orbiter is the most fantastic flying machine built by man. Its retirement in 2010 is premature and shortsighted. What a waste of unique hardware and all the associated infrastructure and people skills that have been developed at Kennedy Space Center. (This applies as well to the other NASA Centers and to the Corporate Suppliers.) The knowledge base and support for complex space launches take a significant time to establish, and now we're planning to dismantle the talented workforce at that site, together with the software and procedures established over 123 flights, to begin a new program. Skills will be lost as we wait!

Sent from my iPad

Saturday, February 27, 2016

Fwd: SpaceX launch aborted in final minutes



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Date: February 26, 2016 at 11:01:04 AM CST
To: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Subject: FW: SpaceX launch aborted in final minutes

SpaceX launch scrubs for second time in two days, webcast says

Orlando Sentinel

 

SpaceX webcast says Thursday night launch was scrubbed at last minute

 

Countdown was aborted Thursday at 6:45 p.m., just before a SpaceX launch was scheduled to go up from Cape Canaveral, according to SpaceX's online webcast.

 

It was the second try to launch an SES communications satellite, which was scrubbed shortly before takeoff Wednesday too. Because there was no more time to reload propellant again Thursday, the launch was scrubbed again, and SpaceX gave no time for another attempt at the launch yet.

 

There was no immediate reason provided for the second scrub in two days.

 

At 6:15 p.m., SpaceX had tweeted that propellant was being loaded and the launch was scheduled for 6:47 p.m. from Cape Canaveral. Earlier on Thursday, the launch window was extended out to 8:23 p.m. if necessary.

 

The commercial space company said Wednesday's scrub was "out of an abundance of caution," but that the Falcon 9 rocket "remains healthy." 

 

"Out of an abundance of caution, the team opted to hold launch for today to ensure liquid oxygen temperatures are as cold as possible in an effort to maximize performance of the vehicle."

 

SpaceX has yet to launch this year from Florida's Space Coast.

 

The rocket was supposed to carry an SES satellite into orbit that will help telecommunications and broadcasts in Asia.

 

SES spokeswoman Nita Wright told the Sentinel Wednesday that the crew has remained confident in this launch. 

 

"There is a confidence in the launch because (preparation) is done now," she said. "Now, everything is go, go, go until launch."

 

After launch, SpaceX was going to try to land the first-stage booster on an ocean barge for the first time after three failed attempts. 

 

Industry experts said the landing would cut costs for the company, resulting in a smaller financial threshold for launching payloads into space.

 

"One of the limiting factors to a more-robust space program is the cost of getting payloads into orbit," said Rob Salonen of Florida Institute of Technology. "If SpaceX can make it less expensive to do that, it lowers the cost of that orbit."

 

SES has more than 50 satellites already in orbit and the launch of SES-9 will expand its capacity, company officials said.

 

When SpaceX last tried to land a booster in January, one of its four legs buckled on the barge, resulting in an explosion that CEO Elon Musk posted on his social media accounts.

 

But experts say the variables of a barge landing, including precise location and speed of descent, make it much tougher than doing so on land, which the company has already done.

 

 

 

 

SpaceX launch aborted in final minutes

 

SpaceX kept an upgraded Falcon 9 rocket on the ground Thursday after running into a problem loading super-cold liquid propellants into the launcher's fuel tanks, postponing blastoff of a commercial communications satellite for the second day in a row.

 

The California-based rocket company did not say when the next launch attempt could occur.

 

The Falcon 9 rocket's countdown proceeded normally Thursday until a member of the SpaceX launch team called a hold at approximately T-minus 1 minute, 41 seconds, before the scheduled launch time of 6:47 p.m. EST (2347 GMT).

 

The cause of the last-minute abort was an issue with loading cryogenic liquid oxygen into the rocket, according to a SpaceX official on the official launch webcast. Both stages of the Falcon 9 burn a mixture of RP-1 kerosene fuel and liquid oxygen.

 

SpaceX released no other details on the problem, only tweeting: "Countdown held for the day. Teams are reviewing the data and next available launch date."

 

The Falcon 9 launch team continued to troubleshoot the rocket's fueling system after Thursday evening's scrub to identify the problem and develop a fix.

 

The SES 9 communications satellite fastened atop the 229-foot-tall launcher has been delayed more than six months after a Falcon 9 failure last year grounded SpaceX's workhorse fleet.

 

Engineers called off a launch attempt Wednesday less than an hour before liftoff to allow the Falcon 9's liquid oxygen supply to cool off to the desired temperature, a requirement for the latest iteration of SpaceX's rocket.

 

The first flight of the upgraded launcher in December carried 11 small communications satellites into orbit, and SES 9's flight marks the second launch of the new rocket model.

 

Designed to loft heavier cargo into space, the upgraded Falcon 9 burns a super-chilled mixture of RP-1 and liquid oxygen.

 

The modified Falcon 9 consumes a super-chilled propellant mix that allows engineers to load additional fuel into the rocket. The cryogenic liquid oxygen is chilled closer to its freezing point, from minus 298 degrees Fahrenheit to minus 340 degrees, while the Falcon 9's RP-1 fuel — a refined form of kerosene — is cooled from a standard room temperature of about 70 degrees Fahrenheit to 20 degrees, according to Elon Musk, SpaceX's founder and CEO.

 

The change essentially allows engineers to load more propellant mass into the the volume of the Falcon 9 fuel tanks, which are also slightly enlarged on the upgraded rocket. The denser fuel mix flows faster into the rocket's Merlin engines, adding extra thrust to haul heavier satellites into orbit and leaving leftover fuel to attempt landings of the booster for future reuse.

 

The first stage's nine Merlin 1D engines collectively generate 1.5 million pounds of thrust at sea level, up from 1.3 million force-pounds on the earlier version of the Falcon 9. All told, the changes allow the Falcon 9 to deliver about 30 percent more mass to orbit without extra thrust from strap-on boosters or other major additions to the booster, according to SpaceX.

 

The upgrades also allow SpaceX to recover the first stage of the Falcon 9 on more launches, a capability previously limited by the type of mission it performed.

 

SpaceX engineers struggled to master the handling of the super-cold densified propellants at the Falcon 9 launch pad before the maiden flight of the upgraded rocket in December, but the rocket successfully took off the first time it received propellants on a real launch attempt.

 

The launch team updated the Falcon 9's countdown procedures to account for the sensitivity of the super-chilled propellants.

 

Instead of loading the propellants three hours before liftoff, the upgraded Falcon 9 receives its fuel in the final 30 minutes of the countdown to minimize the time the cryogenic liquid sits inside the rocket tanks and warms up in the mild ambient temperatures of Florida's Space Coast.

 

 

 

Cernan 's comments to House on HSF

http://marklarson.com/genecernan/House_Hearing_Statement.pdf

Friday, February 26, 2016

One can not Imagine Killing the "Greatest Vehicle ever BUILT". . Re KSC Chief Eng. rev 1

Look at capabilities we need---- gone
Look at jobs- tens of thousands across nation-----gone
Look at new design/ innovations ------------gone
Look at on orbit capabilities---- gone
Look at billions wasted---------gone
Look at our youths interest in space--- gone
Look at periodic on orbit astronaut operations & capabilities developed--- gone

Our leaders were told by experts to keep shuttle flying!

Outside box leader should re-start this program & improve this amazing vehicle! As summarized by a former Chief Engineer at Kennedy Space Center, “The Orbiter is the most fantastic flying machine built by man. Its retirement in 2010 is premature and shortsighted. What a waste of unique hardware and all the associated infrastructure and people skills that have been developed at Kennedy Space Center. (This applies as well to the other NASA Centers and to the Corporate Suppliers.) The knowledge base and support for complex space launches take a significant time to establish, and now we’re planning to dismantle the talented workforce at that site, together with the software and procedures established over 123 flights, to begin a new program. Skills will be lost as we wait!

Thursday, February 25, 2016

Proper Approach to USA manned spaceflight program!

The most obvious way to control the risks associated with current NASA planning is to retain the Space Shuttle capability in some form until there is demonstrated American provided capability to transport humans and cargo to and from the ISS. Retention of the Space Shuttle would provide all of the capability to protect the integrity of the Space Station and its science programs. The issue as always is cost; however, the cost model could be significantly moderated by commercializing the Space Shuttle Program. Estimates are that a commercial venture could operate the Space Shuttle for a couple flights per year at perhaps 1/3 of its current cost. The critical skills are still available at this time. This would enable America to continue the same capability to support the ISS, and even conduct other priority earth orbit missions such as American controlled human access to space to support a critical unforeseen national security need.

By establishing commercialized Space Shuttle operations, NASA can take a known and reliable flight system and use it to develop and transition the governance and oversight processes needed for the COTS era operations. In addition to mitigating the risks and uncertainties associated with current NASA plans, America would retain its prominence as a leading participant in human space flight. A professionally done peer reviewed risk assessment will define the risks with their associated uncertainties and highlight where mitigations must be taken. To do otherwise places reliance on hope over experience.

Cernan 's view on manned spaceflight in 2010

http://marklarson.com/genecernan/House_Hearing_Statement.pdf

Cernan laments lack of interest in exploration-- I lament inability to maintain long term EO operational Capabilities!

This is a big , dangerous issue, maintenance of capabilities in EO to protect the USA from our enemies!!!

Having a crash effort to "get going" what we should have been maintaining is very Dangerous!

Last man on the moon laments lack of U.S. interest in space exploration | The Seattle Times

http://www.seattletimes.com/entertainment/movies/last-man-on-the-moon-laments-lack-of-us-interest-in-space-exploration/


Sent from my iPad

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

We are going to have to Reverse many O decisions--- the Shuttle is one of them!

We built it, We put in museum, We can Take it out of museum!!

And we can improve it. Re nasaproblems.com.

That is what we should do, IF we only had leaders who could think outside the box!

WE are going to have to Reverse many O decisions---- THIS is one of them


Re Page section of this blog.

Shuttle in museum is CRAZY---- GET IT OUT--- write you senators & reps everyday!!!!

This unique & capable system is the greatest vehicle ever built ( KSC chief engineer).

Re the case to save shuttle, Thompson talk at baker institute, lost in space-- Abbey .

People, please get mad & raise hell !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Monday, February 22, 2016

You better get our inadequate space capabilities FIXED-- your Progeny's Survival depends on It!

Look at what can be done from space. Consider the present program plans of most of the major Nations on Earth!

The liberals are anti a strong AMERICA , they want us to be governed by the UN , which would be a disaster!

If you want AMERICA to remain as it has been, better get busy, otherwise a disaster is coming!

You better give the status of our space/ military Some SERIOUS thought!

This country is in trouble. Our leadership has let our capabilities in space & military in general decline to such a degree that this country is in serious danger!!

Compare what we had in 2008 & NOW!!!

Better tweet your reps before it is too late!

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Fwd: Virgin Galactic unveils second SpaceShipTwo - SpaceNews.com



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Date: February 21, 2016 at 9:41:50 AM CST
To: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Subject: FW: Virgin Galactic unveils second SpaceShipTwo - SpaceNews.com

 

http://spacenews.com/wp-content/themes/spacenews/assets/img/logo.png

 

 

ss2 rollout bransonVirgin Galactic founder Sir Richard Branson stands in the sunroof of an SUV that towed the new SpaceShipTwo into view during a Feb. 19 ceremony in Mojave, California. Credit: SpaceNews photo by Jeff Foust

MOJAVE, Calif. — Virgin Galactic rolled out its second SpaceShipTwo suborbital spaceplane Feb. 19 as the company seeks to rebound from a fatal test flight accident more than a year ago.

In a ceremony at Virgin Galactic's Final Assembly, Integration and Test Hangar here attended by a mix of dignitaries, celebrities and some of its several hundred customers, the company showed off a vehicle that the company billed as a symbol as its determination to recover from the October 2014 loss of the first SpaceShipOne during a test flight.

"One of reasons that we're so proud of the spaceship we will shortly present to you is that it is the product not just of skill and determination, but of a willingness to learn and a commitment to continually improve," George Whitesides, Virgin Galactic chief executive, said at the event.

The event had much of the pomp and circumstance of many Virgin events. The company towed the new SpaceShipTwo into the center of the hangar using an SUV, with company founder Sir Richard Branson standing in the vehicle's sunroof. Later, he called upon his one-year-old granddaughter to christen the spacecraft using bottle of milk.

ss2 crowdsCrowds gather around the second SpaceShipTwo after the rollout ceremony. Credit: SpaceNews photo by Jeff Foust

The vehicle is very similar to the first SpaceShipTwo with only a few noticeable differences, such as larger horizontal stabilizers on the vehicle's twin tail booms and changes to its paint scheme. Company officials, though, said the vehicle incorporates other changes from both the earlier testing and development of SpaceShipTwo and the accident.

"It's an evolutionary change," said Mike Moses, senior vice president for operations at Virgin Galactic, in a briefing prior to the rollout. That includes changes learned from the development and early flight tests of the first SpaceShipTwo, such as changes to the structure and routing of wiring within the vehicle. "There's nothing really sexy or exciting about those changes. That's just the evolution of the design."

Other changes, though, direct address the Oct. 31, 2014, accident, which was caused when co-pilot Michael Alsbury prematurely unlocked the feathering mechanism that raises the vehicle's tail, causing an aerodynamic instability that broke the vehicle apart. A control system will physically lock the feathering lever in place when it is unsafe to engage the feathering system.

Moses added that there are other, unspecified changes to the vehicle as a result of the accident. "We used the lens of that accident to look at everything else we do, in manufacturing, in ground processing, in servicing the vehicle and in flying the vehicle," he said. "We looked at systems way beyond what the scope of the accident investigation asked us to look at."

The rollout marks the beginning of the vehicle's test program, although company officials said it will be some time before this SpaceShipTwo takes to the sky. Moses said there will be a series of ground tests of various vehicle systems, followed by taxi tests on the runway at the Mojave Air and Space Port. That will be followed by "captive carry" flights, where SpaceShipTwo remains attached to its WhiteKnightTwo carrier aircraft, glide flights, and finally powered flights.

Company officials stubbornly refused to provide a detailed schedule for those test flights, including when the vehicle might be ready, even in a best-case scenario, to begin commercial service. "As soon as we tell you guys a date, we starting being held to one, and that's why we don't want the team being held that pressure," Moses said.

Whitesides, though, said he expected many parts of the fight test program to run more quickly than for the first SpaceShipTwo, given the experience from that test program. "We just need to know that the vehicle we have is performing the same way as the last one did," he said.

Virgin officials also said that they have made progress on the vehicle's hybrid propulsion system since the accident, an effort that had suffered years of delays and changes in technical design during SpaceShipTwo's overall development. "That was always the long pole in the tent for [SpaceShipTwo] serial number one, by years," said Doug Shane, president of The Spaceship Company, the Virgin subsidiary responsible for building SpaceShipTwo.

whitesidesVirgin Galactic CEO George Whitesides said he expected the test schedule for the second SpaceShipTwo would go faster than the first, but would not give a specific timetable for flights. Credit: SpaceNews photo by Jeff Foust

Shane said the company has settled on a rubber-based solid fuel called hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB), after testing both that and a polyamide fuel similar to nylon over the years. An internal company team has made "phenomenal progress" on the motor, he said, and the company is close to qualifying the motor for flight. "We'll enter this flight test program with a rocket motor system that we'll know will work, which really hobbled the serial number one flight testing program."

Virgin Galactic also used the rollout to briefly reflect on the earlier accident. "With the great sense of achievement and excitement, there is also a sense of poignancy," Whitesides said.

Shane, who noted at the rollout he had been involved with SpaceShipTwo and its predecessor SpaceShipOne at Scaled Composites since 1999, also noted the loss of Alsbury, who was killed in the accident. "I know he believed in this mission, and in this technology, and in this vehicle design," he said of Alsbury. "And we've made this a better and safer system because making a better and safer system was what Mike was all about."

 

 © 2016 SpaceNews, Inc. All rights reserved. 

 


 

Absolute Superior Control of Space!

The USA needs absolute superior control of space for our survival. Presently our capabilities are declining with no plans to regain shuttle or Apollo like capabilities. The X37C needs to go forward re Boeing proposal. Space capabilities are part of our overall military capability which must be absolutely superior PERIOD. We need both shuttle & moon base capabilities plus the proposed but never implemented Shuttle Heavy Lift capability.


USA Survival depends on Absolute Superior Space Capabilities-!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

. control of space critical to USA! our capabilities are declining with no plans to regain shuttle capabilities!

Sent from my iPad

Do you understand what this vehicle is capable of?? No replacement in sight!

DO YOU want another country to control the USA ? Control of Space is serious business--- Our capability is declining!!!

Seems people would easily UNDERSTAND this--- rather easy to understand!

The ultimate Control of Earth depends on control of space.

Do you want another country to control the USA ?

All USA citizens better tweet their congressional reps. & all potus candidates!

Fwd: Record number apply to be NASA astronauts

Not many will be needed with present plans!!

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Date: February 21, 2016 at 9:43:22 AM CST
To: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Subject: FW: Record number apply to be NASA astronauts

 

 

Feb. 19, 2016

16-018

Record Number of Americans Apply to #BeAnAstronaut at NASA

Astronaut Terry Virts conducts a spacewalk during an orbital sunrise on Feb. 21, 2015.

Astronaut Terry Virts conducts a spacewalk during an orbital sunrise on Feb. 21, 2015.

Credits: NASA

NASA Astronaut Barry WIlmore training in NB:

NASA astronaut Barry Wilmore trains for spacewalks in the Neutral Buoyancy Lab at the agency's Johnson Space Center in Houston.

Credits: NASA

More than 18,300 people applied to join NASA's 2017 astronaut class, almost three times the number of applications received in 2012 for the most recent astronaut class, and far surpassing the previous record of 8,000 in 1978.

"It's not at all surprising to me that so many Americans from diverse backgrounds want to personally contribute to blazing the trail on our journey to Mars," said NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden, himself a former astronaut. "A few exceptionally talented men and women will become the astronauts chosen in this group who will once again launch to space from U.S. soil on American-made spacecraft."

Applications opened Dec. 14, and closed Thursday, but that is just the beginning of an 18-month process that will end with the selection of 8-14 individuals for the opportunity to become astronaut candidates. NASA expects to announce its selections in mid-2017.

Between now and then, NASA's Astronaut Selection Board will review the applications, assessing each candidate's qualifications. The board then will invite the most highly qualified candidates to the agency's Johnson Space Center in Houston for interviews before the final selection is made and the new astronaut candidates report to Johnson for training.

"We have our work cut out for us with this many applications," said Brian Kelly, director of Flight Operations at Johnson. "But it's heartening to know so many people recognize what a great opportunity this is to be part of NASA's exciting mission. I look forward to meeting the men and women talented enough to rise to the top of what is always a pool of incredible applicants."

After reporting at Johnson, the astronaut candidates will go through about two years of initial training on spacecraft systems, spacewalking skills and teamwork, Russian language and other requisite skills.

Those who complete the training will be given technical duties within the Astronaut Office at Johnson before being assigned on any of four different spacecraft: the International Space Station, NASA's Orion spacecraft for deep space exploration, or one of two American-made commercial crew spacecraft currently in development – Boeing's CST-100 Starliner or the SpaceX Crew Dragon.

The commercial crew spacecraft will carry four astronauts to the space station, expanding the orbiting laboratory's crew from six to seven and effectively doubling the amount of crew time available to conduct the important research and technology demonstrations that are advancing our knowledge for the journey to Mars, while also returning benefits to Earth.

For more information about NASA astronauts, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/astronauts

For information about other NASA job opportunities, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/about/career

-end-

Stephanie Schierholz
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1100
stephanie.schierholz@nasa.gov

Brandi Dean
Johnson Space Center, Houston
281-483-5111
brandi.k.dean@nasa.gov

Last Updated: Feb. 19, 2016

Editor: Karen Northon

 


 

Inline image 2

Record number apply to be NASA astronauts

James Dean, FLORIDA TODAY 5:21 p.m. EST February 19, 2016

 

 

Expedition 50/51 crew members Peggy Whitson and Thomas Pesquet of ESA underwater during a spacewalk training last month at NASA's Johnson Space Center, home of the astronaut corps.(Photo: NASA/Bill Brassard)

NASA on Friday reported receiving a record number of applicants — more than 18,300 — to join its next astronaut class.

The total is more than double the previous record of 8,000 back in 1979, just before the space shuttle era began, and nearly three times the number who applied for the last class in 2012, just after the shuttle program's retirement.

The space agency plans to select eight to 14 astronaut candidates by mid-2017.

"A few exceptionally talented men and women will become the astronauts chosen in this group who will once again launch to space from U.S. soil on American-made spacecraft," NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden said in a press release.

NASA hopes to resume astronaut launches from the Space Coast by late 2017 on Boeing or SpaceX capsules bound for the International Space Station.

By 2023, the first crew could fly aboard an Orion exploration capsule launched from Kennedy Space Center by a Space Launch System rocket, on a test flight orbiting the moon. The agency's long-range goal is to send a crew to Mars by the late 2030s.

The application period for the new astronaut class opened Dec. 14 and closed Thursday. NASA said the most qualified applicants will be invited to Johnson Space Center for interviews before final selections are made.

"We have our work cut out for us with this many applications," said Brian Kelly, director of Flight Operations at Johnson Space Center in Houston, home of the astronaut corps.

Minimum requirements to apply included being a U.S. citizen with a bachelor's degree in science, engineering or math disciplines, and at least three years of related experience with increasing responsibilities or at least 1,000 hours piloting jet aircraft.

Including the "Original Seven" Mercury astronauts named in 1959, NASA has selected 338 astronauts to date in 21 groups. Classes are picked every so often based on mission needs.

NASA chose four men and four women as astronaut candidates, or ASCANs, in 2013. They completed two years of training to earn eligibility for flight assignments.

Contact Dean at 321-242-3668 or jdean@floridatoday.com.

 

Copyright © 2016 www.floridatoday.com. All rights reserved. 

 


 

Over 18,300 Apply to Become NASA Astronauts, Smashing Record

By Sarah Lewin, Staff Writer | February 19, 2016 03:46pm ET

Over 18,300 Apply to Become NASA Astronauts, Smashing Record

NASA astronaut Terry Virts (selected in 2000) took this spectacular spacewalk in 2015. A record-breaking 18,300 people have applied to be in NASA's 2017 astronaut class.

Credit: NASA

More than 18,300 people have applied for 14 or fewer spots in NASA's next astronaut class, shattering the 1978 record of 8,000 applicants.

(In 1978, it had been nine years since the previous chance to apply to be an astronaut, and the space shuttle had recently been announced. Plus, it was the first official call for female applicants.)

The prospective astronauts all submitted their applications between Dec.14 and when the application period closed yesterday (Feb. 18) — and the total number is close to triple the applicants for NASA's most recent astronaut class, in 2012. (At the time, the 2012 application pool was the second largest ever at more than 6,300.) [Related: How To Become An Astronaut]

"It's not at all surprising to me that so many Americans from diverse backgrounds want to personally contribute to blazing the trail on our journey to Mars," NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said in a statement. "A few exceptionally talented men and women will become the astronauts chosen in this group who will once again launch to space from U.S. soil on American-made spacecraft."

Bolden himself is a former astronaut, selected as one of a class of 19 in 1980.

Over the next 18 months, NASA's astronaut-selection board will narrow the applicants down, and the top applicants will interview at Johnson Space Center in Houston — ultimately, NASA will select a final set of eight to 14 astronaut candidates to begin training.

The training process will take about two years, and will include "training on spacecraft systems, spacewalking skills and teamwork, Russian language and other requisite skills," NASA officials said in the statement.

Ultimately, those who make it through the training will be assigned to either the International Space Station, NASA's Orion spacecraft, the Boeing CST-100 Starliner or the SpaceX Crew Dragon. Orion, currently in development to launch in the early 2020s on the new Space Launch System megarocket, will be able to support a crew of four for up to 21 days — habitat modules will be added for longer journeys, such as visiting Mars or deep space. Both the Starliner and Crew Dragon are in development aided by NASA's commercial crew program to bring four astronauts to the space station at a time.

But first, NASA's astronaut-selection board has its hands full choosing the most qualified candidates from the enormous pool of astronaut hopefuls for the 2017 astronaut class.

"We have our work cut out for us with this many applications," Brian Kelly, director of Flight Operations at Johnson Space Center, said in the statement. "But it's heartening to know so many people recognize what a great opportunity this is to be part of NASA's exciting mission. I look forward to meeting the men and women talented enough to rise to the top of what is always a pool of incredible applicants."

 

Copyright © 2016 TechMediaNetwork.com All rights reserved. 

 


 

 

Saturday, February 20, 2016

We should Get them back in Service!!!!

REAL Space Act of 2013 Thank you Bobby for posting this

This does not seem to be a good time to throw away three functioning Shuttle orbiters, thereby discarding a working national space faring capability, one carefully built and paid for over the last 50 years
On February 15, 2011 a symposium entitled "U.S. Human Spaceflight: Continuity and Stability" was held at Rice University's James A. Baker Institute of Public Policy. Organized by George Abbey, the resident space expert at the Baker Institute, one might have suspected that it would be Shuttle-centric and indeed, it was. Many pertinent points relevant to the current discussion about NASA's human space program and its future (or lack thereof) came out of the presentations at this symposium.
The program featured several speakers, all of whom played major roles in the Shuttle program. I found comments by Robert F. "Bob" Thompson most interesting. Bob Thompson is one of the true "old guard" – an original member of Bob Gilruth's Space Task Group at NASA Langley, a group pre-dating the Mercury Program. Thompson was head of the Apollo Applications Program (Skylab) and the first manager of the Space Shuttle program. Many of his remarks resonate strongly with points I have made here and elsewhere about serious problems being dismissed or ignored in the unseemly rush to re-vamp NASA from an operational space flight agency into a check-writing bureaucracy for New Space endeavors.
Thompson's theme was a considered and educated look at what discarding the country's Space Shuttle Program means. Both his talk and the talk by Howard DeCastro (Shuttle Program Manager at the United Space Alliance, which operates the Shuttle system for NASA) carefully outlined the history of the Shuttle program and the possibility of flying the Shuttle commercially until a new system becomes available, thereby retaining our national spaceflight capability. They covered the many compromises made both in Shuttle's conception and in its execution, as well as its unique capabilities. The Shuttle can both deliver and retrieve payloads from space; it is a fully integrated transport and servicing system in low Earth orbit. The famous Hubble Space Telescope would be a useless piece of junk instead of a national treasure without the Shuttle missions that first allowed for the repair of its defective vision and then returned to service the instrument in space multiple times over the ensuing decade.
An often ignored but critically important issue is the supporting infrastructure for spaceflight. Thompson made the analogy that when people see a Shuttle Orbiter, they really are seeing just the "tip of an iceberg." The Shuttle is more than an orbiter vehicle; it is also the servicing facilities at the Cape that process and prepare the orbiter for launch. It is the ET fabrication facilities at Michoud and the SRB plant at Promontory as well as the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) that has performed flawlessly over the 133 flights to date. It is the mobile crawler and the launch towers at Pad 39-A. And it is the trained cadre of people that put all the pieces together and make them work in concert to deliver and return people and equipment from space. Thompson rhetorically encompassed his argument thusly: The Shuttle is a "dumb vehicle that cost too much" but is a "fully functional part of a space transportation system – an 18-wheel, extended cab work vehicle." He told the audience that Orion, Soyuz and Progress were more like "taxis" and "pickup trucks." He said that the Constellation vehicles (chosen to implement the 2004 Vision) were bad decisions, followed on now by an even worse decision.
Thompson used a familiar graphic, the chart showing NASA's fraction of the annual federal budget over decades (see above). The large spike centered around 1966 represents peak spending for the Apollo program. Thompson made two specific observations about this graph. First, Richard Nixon (who took office in 1969) is often damned as the President who "killed Apollo." But the graph shows that the ramp-down in spending for Apollo began two years earlier in 1967, in Lyndon Johnson's administration. The Vietnam War required some of NASA's money, so Apollo-Saturn production managers were told to build the equipment needed to fulfill Kennedy's decadal goal and shut down thereafter.
Additionally, Thompson made the very significant point (one usually ignored by many engaged in space policy debates) that the "Apollo spike" paid for the infrastructure – the buildings, laboratories, test and training facilities, and launch systems – that Apollo used and that the Shuttle uses to this day. By terminating the Shuttle with no follow-on, the fate of most of this infrastructure is the scrap heap. Note that the "Apollo spike" in funding happened forty years ago. To design and build the supporting infrastructure for human spaceflight in the mid-1960s, we annually spent ten times the fraction of the budget that we do now. Given the reality of the nation's finances, NASA will be lucky if they can continue to get one-half of one percent of federal spending per year. This does not seem to be a good time to throw away three functioning Shuttle orbiters, thereby discarding a working national space faring capability, one carefully built and paid for over the last 50 years.
Several New Space companies are working on vehicle designs, which, if successful in creating a replacement space "work vehicle," will need their own supporting infrastructure. These efforts will necessitate creating all the facilities mentioned above for their vehicles and systems. The cost of any given single launch is rolled into one number, but it must cover a multitude of expenses. Amortized over many decades, they may eventually pay for it all, but only if they can get enough business to fly their vehicles regularly and often. With NASA as their principal customer, will enough flights be purchased to take these New Space companies to the level they need in order to make a profit and survive?
Finally, Thompson asked, what is exploration if not living and working in space and contributing to the economy? He understands that exploration is more than going somewhere and planting a flag or collecting some rocks. Each time NASA launches a Shuttle, it puts 100 tons in space. By replacing the orbiter body with a cargo faring, we are creating a heavy lift launch vehicle. This Shuttle side-mount launch vehicle is something that fits the requirements placed on NASA for a new heavy lift vehicle. Its reliability has been consistently improved over the course of more than 30 years of flight experience and is more than adequate for many different kinds of missions throughout cislunar space. This is where the focus of our space program ought to be – and a zone of space specifically mentioned in the new agency authorization.
Preserving, adapting and using what we already have is smarter than destroying capability and starting again from scratch. We are putting faith in the emergence of space systems that will do what we want, when and where we want. We are told that to nurture and foster other providers of space access, we must throw away the bird in our hand and plant a revolutionary new bush, hopeful that it will grow and attract a variety of new birds. I leave it to you to decide the wisdom of such a restrictive course. Plant the bush but don't throw away the only bird we now hold. We must be fully conscious about the realities of non-existent systems and preserve the space transportation capability on which America can rely.


Sent from my iPad

LOOK at money we are sending to muslims! BUT NO MANNED Space prog!

Do a google search on this-- money to govs, mosques, refugees, UN, & on & on.

The republican house is funding.
But, WE CANT have a manned space program.

Sent from my iPad

Hell of a MESS--NO Shuttle, NO Manned Capability, NONE on the way-- & WE pay Russia!

And there does not seem to be much concern in the general public!

Inexplicable to me. If you know of pro shuttle blogs, email info to me. Email on blog.

Friday, February 19, 2016

U.S. Space Programs: Investment Strategy for National Security Space

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/02/an-investment-strategy-for-national-security-space


Sent from my iPad

Fwd: Photos: H-2A rocket soars on groundbreaking astronomy mission



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Date: February 19, 2016 at 6:53:25 PM CST
To: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Subject: FW: Photos: H-2A rocket soars on groundbreaking astronomy mission

 

Photos: H-2A rocket soars on groundbreaking astronomy mission

February 19, 2016 by Stephen Clark

Burning a mixture of super-cold liquid hydrogen, liquid oxygen and pre-packed solid propellant, Japan's H-2A rocket vaulted into a deep blue evening sky over the beaches of Tanegashima Island on Wednesday with a satellite that will see the surroundings of black holes better than ever before.

The 174-foot-tall (53-meter) rocket blasted off at 0845 GMT (2:45 a.m. EST; 5:45 p.m. Japan Standard Time) Wednesday.

The H-2A rocket, flying for the 30th time, flew east from its launch facility at the Tanegashima Space Center situated on the southern shoreline of an island positioned in the Pacific Ocean near the southwestern end of Japan's main islands.

Powered by two solid rocket boosters and a hydrogen-burning LE-7A main engine, the rocket surpassed the speed of sound in less than a minute and reached the edge of space in four minutes.

The launcher's second stage deployed Japan's Hitomi X-ray observatory into orbit more than 350 miles, or about 575 kilometers, above Earth.

Japanese officials named the mission Hitomi, which means eye or pupil in Japanese, in a nod toward the observatory's goals of peering into the chaotic neighborhoods around black holes and resolving the motion and composition of clouds of hot gas permeating the universe's biggest known structures, such as enormous clusters of galaxies.

Photo credit: JAXA

Photo credit: JAXA

Photo credit: JAXA

Photo credit: JAXA

Photo credit: JAXA

Photo credit: JAXA

Photo credit: JAXA

Photo credit: JAXA

Photo credit: JAXA

Photo credit: JAXA

 

 

 

© 2016 Spaceflight Now Inc.

 


 

Fwd: ExoMars orbiter and lander mated for final time



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Date: February 19, 2016 at 6:50:03 PM CST
To: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Subject: FW: ExoMars orbiter and lander mated for final time

 

 

ExoMars orbiter and lander mated for final time

February 19, 2016 by Stephen Clark

https://youtu.be/pO9DvfeYI7Y

European technicians working at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan have bolted an Italian-built Mars lander to its mothership ahead of a March 14 launch toward the red planet.

The attachment is a major step in preparations for next month's launch the European Space Agency's first mission to Mars since 2003, and the first of two flights for the agency's ExoMars program, to be followed in 2018 or 2020 by the launch of an ambitious European rover to the red planet.

The ExoMars mission's Trace Gas Orbiter, a large spacecraft with instruments probe the Martian atmosphere, will blast off with the Schiaparelli lander, which will try to become the first European platform to successfully operate on Mars.

The touchdown attempt in October will come nearly 13 years after Britain's Beagle 2 lander was lost on decent to Mars in 2003.

Officials spotted Beagle 2 in imagery from NASA's Reconnaissance Orbiter more than a decade later, showing the probe apparently intact on the Martian surface. Engineers who analyzed the images believe the lander's solar arrays failed to unfurl properly, blocking Beagle 2's antenna from radioing its status to Earth.

Schiaparelli is a larger, more technologically savvy spacecraft, fitted with advanced avionics, rocket thrusters, a guidance radar, and a European-made supersonic parachute.

Engineers transported the two ExoMars spacecraft from Turin, Italy, to Kazakhstan in December, and ground crews have worked on the orbiter and lander modules separately since they arrived at the launch base.

A technician working near the Schiaparelli lander wears a protective suit after fueling of the spacecraft with hazardous hydrazine fuel. Credit: Thales Alenia Space

A technician working near the Schiaparelli lander wears a protective suit after fueling of the spacecraft with hazardous hydrazine fuel. Credit: Thales Alenia Space

Activities to prepare the mission for launch since December include the fueling of the saucer-shaped Schiaparelli lander with hydrazine propellant and helium pressurant for its flight through the Martian atmosphere.

Technicians clad in hazardous materials suits loaded about 45 kilograms — nearly 100 pounds — of hydrazine into Schiaparelli's three fuel tanks Jan. 30. The lander was already filled with the lightweight helium gas used to push the hydrazine fuel toward the lander's nine small rocket engines.

The fueling with hydrazine gave the Schiaparelli lander — considered a technology demo mission by ESA — a full mass of about 600 kilograms, or more than 1,300 pounds. Schiaparelli's purpose is to verify technologies to be put aboard the ExoMars rover launching no earlier than May 2018.

Specialists from Airbus Defense and Space bond tiles to the outer surface of the Schiaparelli lander. Credit: ESA - B. Bethge

Specialists from Airbus Defense and Space bond tiles to the outer surface of the Schiaparelli lander. Credit: ESA – B. Bethge

Schiaparelli's braking thrusters will guide the lander's descent after a supersonic parachute initially slows down the probe's velocity during entry into the Martian atmosphere Oct. 19. The rocket jets will switch on at an altitude of about 1.3 kilometers — approximately 4,200 feet — above the surface, then switch off when Schiaparelli's Doppler radar detects the craft is just 2 meters — about 6 feet — in altitude.

A crushable carbon fiber shell around the lander will cushion the probe's fall to the surface, then Schiaparelli will turn on its weather station and return data to Earth for up to eight days until it drains its battery.

Engineers from ESA and Thales Alenia Space, builder of the Schiaparelli lander and Trace Gas Orbiter, prepared the descent probe for launch inside an ultra-clean tent enclosure designed to keep out contaminants and microbes that could accompany the mission on its seven-month trip to Mars.

Schiaparelli's ground team moves the landing module for attachment to the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter. Credit: ESA - B. Bethge

Schiaparelli's ground team moves the landing module for attachment to the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter. Credit: ESA – B. Bethge

Scientists want to avoid inadvertently sending microbes from Earth to Mars because they could ruin research into ancient Martian history aimed at determining whether the planet ever harbored life of its own.

The Baikonur Cosmodrome did not have facilities capable of such stringent modern "planetary protection" standards, officials said, so the ExoMars team brought extra gear to meet the cleanliness requirement.

Workers hoisted Schiaparelli atop the Trace Gas Orbiter on Feb. 12 and mated the lander to its carrier craft with 27 screws, which connected a separation assembly between the two modules. When the lander deploys from the orbiter Oct. 16, three days before both spacecraft arrive at Mars, springs on the separation apparatus will push Schiaparelli away, according to a description posted on ESA's website.

Credit: ESA - B. Bethge

Credit: ESA – B. Bethge

Technicians connected electrical cables between the lander and orbiter Feb. 13, followed by two days of checks to verify the spacecraft still functioned properly after their attachment.

Experts from Airbus Defense and Space responsible for Schiaparelli's heat shield installed the lander's final three thermal protection tiles after probe was perched atop the Trace Gas Orbiter.

The lander's tiles are made of Norcoat Liège, a thermal ablative material composed of resin and cork, bonded to a carbon sandwich structure. Workers could not add the last tiles until Schiaparelli was in launch configuration because the heat shield covers hooks required to lift the lander atop the orbiter.

The 600-kilogram (1,322-pound) Schiaparelli lander was hoisted atop the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter on Feb. 12. Credit: ESA - B. Bethge

The 600-kilogram (1,322-pound) Schiaparelli lander was hoisted atop the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter on Feb. 12. Credit: ESA – B. Bethge

Primarily developed and financed by Italy, Schiaparelli could encounter temperatures as high as 3,360 degrees Fahrenheit (1,850 degrees Celsius) during the plunge through the Martian atmosphere.

With Schiaparelli now together with the Trace Gas Orbiter, the combined spacecraft stands more than 3 meters (10 feet) tall.

The next step to ready the spacecraft for launch will be the fueling of the orbiter with its own propellant supply in the coming week. The orbiter's total propellant load will be about 2.3 metric tons — more than 5,000 pounds — giving the combined spacecraft a mass of 4.3 metric tons — about 9,480 pounds — at the time of liftoff.

A close-up view of the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter and its high-gain antenna (center). The Schiaparelli lander is visible attached to the top of the orbiter. Credit: ESA - B. Bethge

A close-up view of the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter and its high-gain antenna (center). The Schiaparelli lander is visible attached to the top of the orbiter. Credit: ESA – B. Bethge

While Schiaparelli heads for landing Mars, the mothership will fire its main engine to steer into orbit around the red planet, eventually settling into a circular orbit 400 kilometers, or about 250 miles, above the surface after a series of "aerobreaking" maneuvers to use the Martian atmosphere's drag to lower its altitude.

The orbiter's prime mission is to measure how much methane is in the Martian atmosphere, and trace the source the gas. The spacecraft will also relay commands and science data between Earth and landers on the surface of Mars, such as the ExoMars rover and NASA's fleet of Martian robots.

Once ground teams fuel the orbiter, the ExoMars spacecraft will be added to a Breeze M rocket stage, which will propel the probe away from Earth after blasting off aboard a Russian Proton rocket.

ESA partnered with Russia for the ExoMars program after NASA withdrew due to budget constraints.

The ExoMars 2016 mission is set for liftoff at 0931 GMT (5:31 a.m. EDT) on March 14, the opening of a 12-day launch window.

 

© 2016 Spaceflight Now Inc.

 


 

Fwd: NASA Technologies We Use Every Day



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: Kent Castle <kent.d.castle@hotmail.com>
Date: February 19, 2016 at 4:24:45 PM CST
To: Reason Marilou <loganlou55@yahoo.com>, Bogan Carole <bcbogan@earthlink.net>, Choban Peter <peter.s.choban@aero.org>, Patterson James <w8ljz@aol.com>, Madsen Ron <ronstar@pdq.net>, Martin Bobby <bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com>
Subject: FW: NASA Technologies We Use Every Day


 

From:
To: ;
Subject: NASA Technologies We Use Every Day
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:14:34 -0600

6 NASA Technologies We Use Every Day

02/17/2016 11:04 am ET | Updated 6 hours ago
  • ThrillistEverything worth caring about in food, drink, and travel

By: Joe McGauley
@jwmcgauley

2016-02-17-1455724094-2431515-main.jpg
Credit: Wikimedia Commons/NASA

The Apollo missions were not only impressive for the fact that, you know, we succeeded in putting a man on the moon, but also because the push to reach it kickstarted a prolific era of innovation. It hasn't yet come to a halt as we continue to reap the benefits of the groundbreaking technology and advanced materials necessary for man's most audacious endeavors.

To put things into perspective, we've rounded up 11 everyday items that were originally developed by NASA and its allies to help us explore the great beyond. Chances are, you've used one or more of these in the last week. Let the games begin.

2016-02-17-1455724193-2473047-1.jpg
Credit: Flickr/John McStravick

Better sunglasses
Ever wonder how it is that your five-year-old Ray-Bans haven't been scratched to all hell, considering what you've put them through? Thank big brother NASA, who in their never-ending quest for defense against the ravages of our atmosphere and beyond, developed a technique called "direct ion deposition" that creates a thin, ultra-protective layer of diamond-like carbon. So that the ground-bound can also take advantage of the science, the masterful technique
has now been licensed out to sunglasses companies.

2016-02-17-1455724283-521768-2.jpg
Credit: Youtube/Medical and Dental

Nice teeth
To prompt solar panels on satellites to deploy outward once in orbit, NASA built them using a durable metal alloy known as
nitinol, which is defined by its ability to spring back to shape -- after bending -- once warmed up. These days, orthodontists regularly use braces with nitinol wire to ensure they hold their shape in the intense warmth of patients' mouths.

2016-02-17-1455724350-2173801-3.jpg
Credit: Wikimedia Commons/Johan

Memory foam
Your outrageously comfortable "viscoelastic polyurethane foam" slumber pod exists solely because NASA needed a way to keep astronauts from bouncing around like crash-test dummies while strapped into the return capsules and shuttles.

2016-02-17-1455724569-1826646-4.jpg
Credit: Wikimedia Commons/NASA

Freeze-dried food
That novelty astronaut ice cream you just had to buy on a field trip to the science museum? Yeah, that was actually a pretty big deal. Since it was crucial to keep a mission's weight down, NASA
devised a way to keep the astronauts stocked with food via freeze-dried meals, which retain 98% of their original nutritional value and only 20% of their original weight. Think about that next time you pour a bowl of Lucky Charms.

2016-02-17-1455724667-3546978-5.jpg
Credit: Flickr/Oregon State University

Microchips
The fact that there are computers small enough to fit in our pockets is a testament to the circuitry developed for the Apollo missions' complex onboard navigation systems. The microchip as we know it today evolved out of the first working integrated circuit, which Texas Instruments developed specifically for the Department of Defense and NASA. Now you know who to blame for your crippling Candy Crush addiction.

2016-02-17-1455724728-6725238-6.jpg
Credit: Wikimedia Commons/NASA

Cordless tools
Your freedom to hang shelving and, frankly, anything you damn well please in the middle of nowhere is due in no small part to the advancements
made by Black & Decker in the early '60s at the behest of NASA. They needed tools that astronauts could easily use to obtain samples of moon rock and soil, so the B&D team came up with a then-revolutionary set of battery-powered drills and vacuums.

To find out what other surprising items were developed by NASA, get the full story at Thrillist.com!